Canon EOS R50 V vs Sony ZV-E10

Both the Canon EOS R50 V and Sony ZV-E10 use APS-C sensors of nearly identical size, each offering 24 megapixels of resolution. In practical terms, stills from both cameras are crisp, detailed, and suitable for large prints or cropping.

The Sony ZV-E10 has a slightly larger sensor area (23.5 x 15.6 mm vs. 22.3 x 14.9 mm) and provides a broader native ISO range (100-32000, expandable to 50-51200), which can deliver a slight edge in extreme low-light scenarios and when shadow recovery is important. However, Canon's recent sensors are known for good color science and solid dynamic range, making the difference in most shooting conditions negligible for the average user.

With no anti-aliasing filter and strong JPEG processing, both cameras produce satisfying results straight out of camera. The Canon R50 V does not offer a clear advantage in pure still image quality, balancing the ZV-E10's marginal low-light advantage with Canon's color science.

The Sony ZV-E10 boasts a fast, accurate autofocus system with 425 phase-detection points and proven real-time Eye AF for both humans and animals. Its tracking performance is among the best in its class, making it a top choice for video bloggers, action shots, or pet photography.

Canon's EOS R50 V features Canon's latest Dual Pixel CMOS AF, which has matured rapidly to compete with Sony. While Canon does not specify the number of autofocus points, Dual Pixel AF is known for consistent subject detection, smooth transitions, and reliable face/eye-tracking-especially in video and live-view shooting.

In real-world use, both systems are highly effective and easy to use. That said, Sony's system offers a marginal speed and configurability edge, especially for action or when tracking unpredictable movement across the frame.

The Canon EOS R50 V is a clear front-runner in video features. It records 4K video at up to 60p, offering higher resolution and smoother capture for action or slow-motion effects. This is a significant technical leap over the Sony ZV-E10, which maxes out at 1080p (Full HD) at 24 fps for video. For creators prioritizing sharp, future-proof content or editing flexibility, Canon's 4K/60p is a huge advantage.

Both cameras feature a fully articulating 3-inch screen to aid vlogging and self-recording. Canon includes digital stabilization to help steady handheld footage-though it introduces a crop and can't match in-body stabilization systems, it still offers more than the ZV-E10's complete lack of stabilization.

Sony does offer reliable autofocus during filming and advanced audio capabilities with its Multi Interface Shoe, but its video resolution limits are a major downside for today's content creators. As such, the R50 V easily claims the win for video.

Both cameras are impressively compact and lightweight, making them excellent choices for travel and handheld shooting. The Canon EOS R50 V weighs 370g and measures 119 x 74 x 45 mm, while the Sony ZV-E10 is slightly lighter at 343g and even more compact at 115 x 64 x 45 mm. If portability is paramount, Sony's smaller footprint could be advantageous.

Canon offers a slightly higher-resolution touchscreen (1,040,000 vs. 920,000 dots) for sharper image playback and menu navigation, but the practical difference is modest. Neither camera features a built-in viewfinder, keeping the design streamlined for video-first users.

Ergonomically, both are optimized for vloggers with side-articulating screens. The ultimate choice here depends on hand feel, button placement, and individual preference, though Canon's slightly larger grip could benefit users with bigger hands.

The Sony ZV-E10 pulls ahead in battery performance, rated for an impressive 440 shots per charge versus unspecified stats for the Canon EOS R50 V (though similar Canon bodies often fall short of Sony's endurance). This makes the ZV-E10 better-suited for long days of shooting or travel when outlets are scarce.

Both cameras use single SD card slots, with cards easily accessible alongside the battery. Neither offers dual card support or advanced power options seen on higher-end models, so backing up in-camera or shooting for long periods will require extra batteries or cards.

Overall, the Sony ZV-E10 is the more reliable workhorse for battery life and extended shoots.

Priced at $649, the Canon EOS R50 V undercuts the Sony ZV-E10 by $50 while offering significant upgrades in video capabilities-especially 4K 60p video, which is rare at this price point. Canon delivers a more modern touchscreen, digital video stabilization, and advances in autofocus, making this a strong value for new creators who want high-resolution video without breaking the bank.

Sony's ZV-E10, at $700, justifies its price with superior battery life, a highly refined autofocus system, and the benefits of an established E-mount lens system. However, the much lower video specs make it a harder sell to most new buyers-unless they can find it discounted.

Canon's feature set per dollar is simply more compelling for most casual shooters and video creators.

The Sony E-mount system is one of the most mature mirrorless ecosystems on the market, with a vast selection of native lenses from Sony and third-party makers like Sigma, Tamron, and others. This breadth covers everything from ultra-wide to super-telephoto, often at very reasonable prices.

Canon's RF mount is newer, with the RF-S sublineup for APS-C bodies like the R50 V still filling out its range. Canon's native choices are more limited and generally costlier, especially for specialized focal lengths. However, the system is rapidly growing, and adapters allow use of some EF lenses with varied compatibility depending on autofocus features.

For users investing long-term or seeking variety, Sony's lens library is a distinct advantage.