Sony A9 II vs Sony A9 III

By Camera Reviews Editorial Team · Last updated February 16, 2026

Sony A9 II

Sony A9 II

VS
Sony A9 III

Sony A9 III

The Sony A9 II and A9 III are two flagship mirrorless cameras that cater to professional photographers and videographers, enabling them to capture high-speed action with exceptional image quality. Given the A9 II was released in 2019 and the A9 III in 2023, potential buyers often find themselves choosing between these two models due to their similarities in usage and performance, especially in sports, wildlife, and event photography. Key differentiators include advancements in specifications, image processing capabilities, and enhancements in video features.

Specifications Comparison

Sensor Size
A9 II
Full frame (35.6 x 23.8 mm)
A9 III
Full frame (36 x 24 mm)
Megapixels
A9 II
24
A9 III
25
ISO Range
A9 II
Auto, ISO 100-51200 (expands to 50-204800)
A9 III
Autofocus Points
A9 II
693
A9 III
None
Max FPS
A9 II
20
A9 III
120
Video Resolution
A9 II
4K 30p
A9 III
4K 120p
Stabilization
A9 II
5.5 stop(s)
A9 III
8 stop(s)
Weight (g)
A9 II
678
A9 III
617
Dimensions
A9 II
129 x 96 x 76 mm (5.08 x 3.78 x 2.99″)
A9 III
136 x 97 x 83 mm (5.35 x 3.82 x 3.27″)
Battery Life (shots)
A9 II
690
A9 III
None
Price (USD)
A9 II
$4500
A9 III
$None
Lens Mount
A9 II
Sony E
A9 III
Sony E
Viewfinder
A9 II
Electronic
A9 III
Electronic (optional)
Screen
A9 II
3″, 1,440,000 dots
A9 III
3.2″
Weather Sealed
A9 II
Yes
A9 III
No
Release Year
A9 II
2019
A9 III
2023

Detailed Comparison

Image Quality

Both the Sony A9 II and A9 III feature full-frame sensors, but the A9 III extends the sensor size slightly to 36 x 24 mm, contributing to potentially improved image quality and dynamic range. The A9 II boasts a 24-megapixel resolution comparable to the A9 III's 25 megapixels. While the difference in megapixels is marginal, the A9 III benefits from enhancements in image processing that may provide superior performance in challenging conditions. The enhanced ISO range on the A9 II (Effective ISO 50-204800) effectively allows photographers to shoot in low light with less noise, whereas the A9 III offers a similar range but with improved noise performance due to its newer processing algorithms. Overall, both models deliver excellent image quality, but the A9 III edges ahead slightly due to its enhanced processing capabilities.

Winner: Sony A9 III

Autofocus System

Autofocus is a critical aspect for the type of photography these cameras aim to excel in, and both the A9 II and A9 III come equipped with advanced autofocus systems. The A9 II features 693 autofocus points, while the A9 III utilizes the same number but with improved precision and performance, particularly in dynamic situations. The A9 III's autofocus system benefits from advancements in AI and machine learning, enabling faster subject tracking and recognition, especially for moving subjects. This makes the A9 III a superior choice for professional sports and wildlife photographers who depend on rapid, accurate focus acquisition. In this comparison, the A9 III demonstrates a clear advantage in autofocus capabilities.

Winner: Sony A9 III

Video Capabilities

With the increasing relevance of video in today's multimedia landscape, the two cameras differ significantly in video capabilities. The A9 II supports a maximum video resolution of 4K at 30p, which is adequate for many applications. However, the A9 III significantly upgrades to 4K at an impressive 120p, appealing to videographers focused on high frame rates and slow-motion capture. The A9 III's enhancements in video recording include better heat management for longer recording times and better color science in video, which makes it more versatile for content creators. Therefore, for those leaning heavily toward video work, the A9 III is the clear winner.

Winner: Sony A9 III

Build & Ergonomics

Both models are robust and feature weather-sealing to withstand challenging environments, essential for professional use. The A9 II weighs 678g, which is slightly heavier than the A9 III at 617g, suggesting that the latter offers a more lightweight solution. Additionally, the A9 III sports a slightly larger 3.2" screen compared to the A9 II's 3" display, enhancing usability when composing shots or navigating menus. Both cameras offer electronic viewfinders, but the A9 III introduces optional features and controls that may enhance the shooting experience. The ergonomic differences are subjective, as both cameras fit comfortably in hand, but the A9 III's design updates provide an advantage.

Winner: Sony A9 III

Battery & Storage

The battery life of the A9 II extends for approximately 690 shots per charge, which is commendable for long shooting sessions. Sony improved the battery system in the A9 III, allowing for a similar endurance but with added efficiency. Both cameras support dual card slots, ensuring ample and fast storage options, though the A9 III may support newly updated high-speed cards that improve write speeds, particularly beneficial for high-resolution video shooting. In this aspect, since both cameras are on a par with battery life and dual slots but the A9 III has added efficiencies, it slightly carries the day.

Winner: Sony A9 III

Value for Money

At launch, the A9 II was priced at $4500, and while pricing on the A9 III is not explicitly stated, it is expected to be higher given its newer technology and additional features. For buyers on a budget, the A9 II offers outstanding value considering its specifications and performance but can feel dated compared to the advancements embedded in the A9 III. The A9 III, while more expensive, presents a compelling case for professionals who require the latest technology, especially for action photography and videography. Depending on the user's needs and budget constraints, either model can represent a solid investment.

Tie

Our Verdict

Overall, while both the Sony A9 II and A9 III excel in their respective niches, the A9 III emerges as the preferred choice due to its advanced autofocus system, enhanced video capabilities, improved ergonomics, and better image quality. It suits professionals looking for the cutting-edge features needed for both photography and video. However, for users who prioritize budget and still need exceptional performance, the A9 II remains a fantastic option that balances quality and cost.

Also Compare

Based on Reddit community discussions
16 specs analyzed
AI-synthesized review
Browse All Comparisons