Nikon ZR vs Panasonic S1R II

In terms of image quality, the Panasonic S1R II takes a significant lead with its impressive 44.3 megapixels, allowing for larger prints and more cropping flexibility. This resolution is beneficial for landscape, fashion, or any detailed photography where nuance is essential. Although the Nikon ZR offers a respectable 25 megapixels, which is adequate for most applications, it may not satisfy the needs of photographers who prioritize ultra-high resolution. Both cameras feature full-frame sensors that yield excellent high dynamic range and low-light performance, thanks to their advanced ISO capabilities. The Nikon ZR excels with its ISO range of 100-64000, which provides extensive flexibility in various shooting conditions, while the S1R II has a more limited ISO performance but compensates with superior resolution. Thus, for photographers prioritizing resolution, the S1R II is more advantageous.

The Nikon ZR is equipped with a sophisticated autofocus system featuring 273 focus points, providing extensive coverage and accuracy, particularly beneficial for fast-moving subjects. The autofocus performance is reliable in various lighting conditions, thanks to its high ISO range. Comparatively, the specific details of the autofocus system in the Panasonic S1R II are less frequently highlighted in reviews; however, it does utilize a hybrid autofocus system that also provides fast and accurate focusing. Given that the Nikon ZR has a slightly more detailed specification in autofocus points, it edges out in this category, making it a potentially better choice for sports and wildlife photographers who need quick, responsive focus.

When it comes to video capabilities, the Panasonic S1R II is a clear frontrunner with its ability to shoot 8K video at 30 frames per second and 4K video at an impressive 120 frames per second. This makes it particularly appealing for videographers looking to produce high-resolution content. In contrast, the Nikon ZR lacks specified video recording capabilities and primarily focuses on still photography, making it less ideal for video-centric work. Given this strong performance in video, the S1R II is the go-to choice for users who want a hybrid camera that excels in both stills and video.

Both cameras feature solid builds with weather sealing, making them suitable for a variety of shooting environments. The Nikon ZR is slightly lighter at 630 grams compared to the Panasonic S1R II, giving it an edge in portability for users who prefer to carry their gear over long distances. The dimensions of the Nikon ZR are also more compact at 133 x 81 x 49 mm, providing a more ergonomically friendly experience for prolonged handheld use. On the other hand, while the Panasonic S1R II offers a robust build, it may come across as bulkier. Therefore, for photographers emphasizing comfort and weight savings, the Nikon ZR stands out.

Battery life is an important consideration for photographers, especially for those who shoot for extended periods. Unfortunately, specific battery life data is unavailable for either model, making it difficult to declare a winner definitively based on battery performance alone. However, both cameras are expected to perform adequately, with the Nikon ZR potentially benefiting from its streamlined design. Storage options are crucial for high-resolution photography, especially when utilizing the S1R II's 8K video capabilities; thus, both models support dual card slots, which offer redundant storage, increasing their reliability.

Pricing often plays a significant role in camera selection. The Nikon ZR has a price point of $2200, providing a relatively competitive option given its features tailored towards still photography and its impressive autofocus capabilities. Conversely, the Panasonic S1R II carries a higher price tag due to its advanced video features and higher resolution, which may not be necessary for all users. However, for those in need of high-resolution video and advanced video features, the extra investment in the S1R II may be justified. In essence, it boils down to user needs: still photographers may favor the value offered by the Nikon ZR, while hybrid shooters may find the investment in the S1R II worthwhile.