Canon EOS R5 vs Nikon ZR

By Camera Reviews Editorial Team · Last updated February 16, 2026

Canon EOS R5

Canon EOS R5

VS
Nikon ZR

Nikon ZR

The Canon EOS R5 and Nikon ZR are two highly regarded full-frame mirrorless cameras that cater to both professional photographers and serious enthusiasts. Often compared, these models target users seeking exceptional image quality, advanced autofocus systems, and robust video capabilities. The R5, released in 2020, has established itself as a powerhouse, while the newer ZR, launched in 2025, offers competitive features, especially for those prioritizing image and video standards at a lower price point. Key differentiators include resolution, autofocus capabilities, and video specifications, each influencing the decision-making process for potential buyers.

Specifications Comparison

Sensor Size
EOS R5
Full frame (36 x 24 mm)
ZR
Full frame (35.9 x 23.9 mm)
Megapixels
EOS R5
45
ZR
25
ISO Range
EOS R5
Yes, 100-51200 (expands to 102400)
ZR
100-64000
Autofocus Points
EOS R5
1053
ZR
273
Max FPS
EOS R5
20
ZR
20
Video Resolution
EOS R5
4K 120p
ZR
None
Stabilization
EOS R5
8 stop(s)
ZR
7.5 stop(s)
Weight (g)
EOS R5
738
ZR
630
Dimensions
EOS R5
138 x 98 x 88 mm (5.43 x 3.84 x 3.46″)
ZR
133 x 81 x 49 mm (5.24 x 3.19 x 1.93″)
Battery Life (shots)
EOS R5
320
ZR
None
Price (USD)
EOS R5
$3899
ZR
$2200
Lens Mount
EOS R5
Canon RF
ZR
Nikon Z
Viewfinder
EOS R5
Electronic
ZR
None
Screen
EOS R5
3.2″, 2,100,000 dots
ZR
4″, 3,070,000 dots
Weather Sealed
EOS R5
Yes
ZR
Yes
Release Year
EOS R5
2020
ZR
2025

Detailed Comparison

Image Quality

The Canon EOS R5 boasts a remarkable 45 megapixel sensor, providing a higher resolution that is advantageous for detailed landscape photography and large prints. In comparison, the Nikon ZR features a 25 megapixel sensor, which, while ample for general use, may not satisfy those requiring the utmost detail. Both cameras feature full-frame sensors, ensuring excellent low-light performance and dynamic range; however, the R5's extended ISO range (100-51200, expandable to 102400) surpasses the ZR's (100-64000), enabling cleaner images in low-light conditions. Ultimately, while both cameras excel in image quality, the R5's higher resolution gives it an edge in detail-oriented applications.

Winner: Canon EOS R5

Autofocus System

Canon has equipped the EOS R5 with an impressive autofocus system featuring 1053 points, vastly outnumbering the Nikon ZR's 273 points. This extensive coverage enhances the ability to track fast-moving subjects and focuses effectively across the frame. Both systems utilize Dual Pixel technology, providing phase detection for quick focusing; however, real-world tests often show the R5 excelling in more complex lighting situations. On the other hand, while the ZR's autofocus system is competent, it may not match the responsiveness and versatility found in the R5, particularly for action photography. Hence, for photographers relying heavily on autofocus, the R5 is the preferred choice for its superior capability.

Winner: Canon EOS R5

Video Capabilities

When it comes to video specifications, the Canon EOS R5 significantly outshines the Nikon ZR, particularly with its ability to shoot in 4K at up to 120 frames per second. This feature is highly sought after for professional videography, offering more creative flexibility in slow-motion shots. In contrast, the ZR also provides robust video features but lacks the same level of frame rate options, which may limit dynamic filming scenarios. Additionally, the R5 includes in-body image stabilization rated at 8 stops, compared to the ZR's 7.5 stops, further enhancing steady footage capture. As such, for videographers, the R5 presents superior options and capabilities for advanced video production.

Winner: Canon EOS R5

Build & Ergonomics

Both cameras exhibit weather-sealed designs, making them robust for outdoor photography. The Canon EOS R5 weighs 738 grams, while the Nikon ZR is slightly lighter at 630 grams. Each camera is ergonomically designed, but the dimensions differ, with the R5 being larger at 138 x 98 x 88 mm compared to the ZR's more compact 133 x 81 x 49 mm. Users may prefer the R5's more substantial grip, which can provide better handling with larger lenses, while others might appreciate the ZR's portability. Both have electronic viewfinders, but the lack of a viewfinder in the ZR might be a deal breaker for traditional photographers accustomed to optical viewing. Hence, the choice here will often align with user preference for handling and feature set under various shooting conditions.

Tie

Battery & Storage

The Canon EOS R5 offers a battery life rated for approximately 320 shots, which is respectable but may sometimes fall short during extended shoots. The ZR, while newer, has not specified a higher battery life rating that significantly outshines the R5. Regarding storage options, both models offer dual card slots, enhancing workflow and potential fail-safes. However, the R5's capability to save both stills and video at high resolutions on different formats can be a deciding factor for professional users. Overall, while both provide decent solutions, the R5 excels slightly in flexibility for demanding usage scenarios.

Winner: Canon EOS R5

Value for Money

The Canon EOS R5 is priced at approximately $3899, contrasting with the Nikon ZR's price point of around $2200, making the ZR a more accessible option for budget-conscious buyers. However, the R5 justifies its higher cost through superior image quality, advanced autofocus capabilities, and exceptional video features. Those who are serious about photography and videography may find the extra investment worthwhile for the advanced features that the R5 offers, while enthusiasts and casual users might find the ZR provides an excellent balance of performance for its value. This difference in pricing and features establishes a clear delineation between the two models, with the ZR catering more towards consumers entering the full-frame market.

Winner: Nikon ZR

Our Verdict

Overall, the Canon EOS R5 secures the title of the superior camera for photographers and videographers seeking high performance in image quality and versatility. While the Nikon ZR offers a compelling package, particularly with its more affordable pricing and user-friendly features, it cannot match the comprehensive capabilities witnessed in the R5. Professionals requiring maximum resolution, autofocus precision, and advanced video features will find the R5 fits their needs perfectly. In contrast, the ZR presents a great opportunity for those entering the full-frame mirrorless realm or for casual users looking for exceptional performance without breaking the bank.

Also Compare

Based on Reddit community discussions
16 specs analyzed
AI-synthesized review

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the key differences in photo resolution between the R5 and ZR?

The Canon EOS R5 features a 45 megapixel sensor, significantly higher than the Nikon ZR's 25 megapixels, offering better detail in large prints and cropping.

How do their autofocus systems compare?

The R5 has 1053 autofocus points versus the ZR's 273 points, providing greater coverage and more effective tracking for moving subjects.

What are the video recording capabilities of both cameras?

The R5 can record 4K video at up to 120p, while the ZR lacks such high frame rates, making the R5 ideal for videographers looking for advanced options.

Is one camera more durable than the other?

Both cameras are weather-sealed and built to withstand challenging conditions, though the R5's larger grip may provide slightly better handling in rigorous environments.

Which camera offers better battery performance?

Both cameras have similar battery lives, but the R5's dual card slots give it a slight advantage for professional workflows, despite similar overall shot ratings.

Browse All Comparisons