Canon EOS R5 Mark II vs Nikon Z9

By Camera Reviews Editorial Team · Last updated February 16, 2026

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

VS
Nikon Z9

Nikon Z9

The Canon EOS R5 Mark II and the Nikon Z9 are two flagship mirrorless cameras that often come up in discussions among professional photographers and serious enthusiasts. With their impressive specifications, these cameras cater to a variety of needs, ranging from high-resolution still photography to high-speed video shooting. Buyers may be choosing between these models based on their brand loyalty, specific shooting styles, or feature sets that align with their photography needs. The key differentiators include sensor resolution, autofocus capabilities, stabilization, video performance, and overall ergonomics.

Specifications Comparison

Sensor Size
EOS R5 Mark II
Full frame (36 x 24 mm)
Z9
Full frame (35.9 x 23.9 mm)
Megapixels
EOS R5 Mark II
45
Z9
46
ISO Range
EOS R5 Mark II
100-51200
Z9
Autofocus Points
EOS R5 Mark II
5850
Z9
493
Max FPS
EOS R5 Mark II
30
Z9
30
Video Resolution
EOS R5 Mark II
None
Z9
4K 120p
Stabilization
EOS R5 Mark II
8.5 stop(s)
Z9
6 stop(s)
Weight (g)
EOS R5 Mark II
746
Z9
1340
Dimensions
EOS R5 Mark II
138 x 98 x 88 mm (5.43 x 3.86 x 3.46″)
Z9
149 x 150 x 91 mm (5.87 x 5.91 x 3.58″)
Battery Life (shots)
EOS R5 Mark II
540
Z9
740
Price (USD)
EOS R5 Mark II
$4299
Z9
$5500
Lens Mount
EOS R5 Mark II
Canon RF
Z9
Nikon Z
Viewfinder
EOS R5 Mark II
Electronic
Z9
Electronic
Screen
EOS R5 Mark II
3.2″, 2,100,000 dots
Z9
3.2″, 2,088,960 dots
Weather Sealed
EOS R5 Mark II
Yes
Z9
Yes
Release Year
EOS R5 Mark II
2024
Z9
2021

Detailed Comparison

Image Quality

Both the Canon EOS R5 Mark II and the Nikon Z9 are equipped with full-frame sensors, with the R5 Mark II having a slightly larger sensor size at 36 x 24 mm compared to the Z9's 35.9 x 23.9 mm. The R5 Mark II has a resolution of 45 megapixels, while the Z9 offers 46 megapixels. In practical terms, the image quality from both cameras is exceptional, producing sharp, detailed images with good dynamic range. The Canon model, however, has the edge in ISO capabilities, with a range that extends from 100 to 51200, allowing it to perform better in low-light situations compared to the Z9's ISO range of 64 to 25600. Low-light performance is a critical consideration for many photographers; therefore, the R5 Mark II might be preferable for night and indoor shooting environments. Nevertheless, the Z9 maintains strong performance even at its upper limits, and some users may favor its color science and image processing algorithms.

Winner: Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Autofocus System

The autofocus systems of both cameras are highly advanced, with the R5 Mark II featuring an impressive 5850 autofocus points, while the Z9 has 493 points. The wide coverage and high point count of the R5 Mark II make it particularly advantageous for fast-moving subjects. Both systems support eye and face detection, but Canon's Dual Pixel CMOS AF technology has historically been regarded as one of the best in the industry for its responsiveness and reliability. The Z9, while slightly behind in point count, is still fast and accurate, especially for tracking subjects across the frame. In practice, users have noted that both cameras perform exceptionally well, but the sheer number of autofocus points and Canon's system's efficiency may tilt the balance in favor of the R5.

Winner: Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Video Capabilities

When it comes to video features, both the EOS R5 Mark II and the Nikon Z9 offer impressive capabilities. The R5 Mark II can shoot up to 30 frames per second (fps) in continuous shooting mode, while the Z9 matches this throughput but excels in 4K video recording, boasting 4K at 120p as a standout feature. The Z9's video recording options are extensive, supporting ProRes 422 HQ, which may be critical for video professionals looking for high-quality outputs. Additionally, the Z9 benefits from advanced heat dissipation features, allowing for longer recording times without overheating, a frequent concern with the R5 Mark II during extended shoots. While both cameras deliver amazing video quality, especially at high resolutions, the Z9 stands out for videographers looking for specific video-centric capabilities.

Winner: Nikon Z9

Build & Ergonomics

In terms of build quality, both the Canon EOS R5 Mark II and the Nikon Z9 are weather-sealed, ensuring durability against environmental challenges. However, the Z9 is significantly heavier at 1340 grams compared to the R5 Mark II's 746 grams, which makes the Canon more portable for shooting over long periods. That said, many users may prefer the heft of the Z9 as it provides a feeling of solidity and stability. The ergonomics also differ subtly; while both feature a tilting touchscreen, the R5 Mark II's screen has a slightly higher resolution, coming in at 2,100,000 dots compared to the Z9's 2,088,960 dots. Ultimately, it comes down to personal preference in handling and balance during use.

Winner: Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Battery & Storage

Battery life is another critical aspect where the Nikon Z9 takes a leading role, providing up to 740 shots on a single charge, while the Canon EOS R5 Mark II offers about 540 shots per charge. This can make a significant difference during long shooting sessions or for event photographers who rely on longer battery life. Both cameras support high-speed CFexpress and SD UHS-II storage types, but the choice of battery life might favor the Z9 for those needing extended duration without swapping batteries frequently. However, in practice, it is recommended to have additional batteries for both cameras to avoid running out of power during shoots, especially considering their high-demand features.

Winner: Nikon Z9

Value for Money

In terms of pricing, the R5 Mark II comes in at $4299, which positions it as a better value option compared to the Z9, priced at $5500. The R5 Mark II offers impressive specifications that cater to a wide range of photography and videography needs while keeping affordability in mind. The additional features of the Z9 justify its price tag for professionals whose work demands the best in speed and video capabilities. Overall, for photographers working on a budget or those who do not need the advanced video features of the Z9, the R5 Mark II presents a compelling case as the more economical choice.

Winner: Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Our Verdict

The overall winner between the Canon EOS R5 Mark II and Nikon Z9 is the Canon, primarily due to its superior image quality, autofocus system, and better value proposition at a lower price point. Although the Nikon Z9 excels in video capabilities and battery life, the R5 Mark II's blend of features makes it suitable for a broader range of photographers. Ultimately, for those who need advanced video features and longer battery life, the Z9 is an excellent choice, but for overall photography versatility and value, the Canon EOS R5 Mark II is the preferred option.

Also Compare

Based on Reddit community discussions
16 specs analyzed
AI-synthesized review

Frequently Asked Questions

Which camera has better low-light performance?

The Canon EOS R5 Mark II has a wider ISO range up to 51200, providing better low-light performance compared to the Nikon Z9, which tops out at 25600.

Is the Z9 worth the higher price?

The Nikon Z9 is worth the higher price if you require advanced video capabilities, longer battery life, and robust build quality for professional video production.

Which camera is better for wildlife photography?

The Canon EOS R5 Mark II's extensive autofocus points and superior tracking capabilities make it a better choice for wildlife photography.

Are both cameras weather-sealed?

Yes, both the Canon EOS R5 Mark II and Nikon Z9 are weather-sealed, making them suitable for shooting in challenging environmental conditions.

How do the lenses compare for these systems?

Both Canon RF and Nikon Z mounts offer a good selection of high-quality lenses, but the choice may depend on specific lenses required for your shooting style and portfolio.

Browse All Comparisons