Canon EOS R5 Mark II vs Nikon Z8

By Camera Reviews Editorial Team · Last updated February 16, 2026

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

VS
Nikon Z8

Nikon Z8

The Canon EOS R5 Mark II and Nikon Z8 are flagship mirrorless cameras that attract serious photographers and videographers alike. Both models deliver impressive specifications and capabilities, making them top contenders for professionals and enthusiasts looking for high performance in their imaging gear. The Canon EOS R5 Mark II, released in 2024, builds upon the success of its predecessor with enhanced features, while the Nikon Z8, launched in 2023, offers an impeccable combination of image quality and usability. Buyers often find themselves choosing between these two due to their similar price points and exceptional feature sets, especially in the domains of autofocus, image quality, and video performance.

Specifications Comparison

Sensor Size
EOS R5 Mark II
Full frame (36 x 24 mm)
Z8
Full frame (35.9 x 23.9 mm)
Megapixels
EOS R5 Mark II
45
Z8
46
ISO Range
EOS R5 Mark II
100-51200
Z8
Autofocus Points
EOS R5 Mark II
5850
Z8
493
Max FPS
EOS R5 Mark II
30
Z8
30
Video Resolution
EOS R5 Mark II
None
Z8
4K 120p
Stabilization
EOS R5 Mark II
8.5 stop(s)
Z8
6 stop(s)
Weight (g)
EOS R5 Mark II
746
Z8
910
Dimensions
EOS R5 Mark II
138 x 98 x 88 mm (5.43 x 3.86 x 3.46″)
Z8
144 x 119 x 83 mm (5.67 x 4.69 x 3.27″)
Battery Life (shots)
EOS R5 Mark II
540
Z8
340
Price (USD)
EOS R5 Mark II
$4299
Z8
$3999
Lens Mount
EOS R5 Mark II
Canon RF
Z8
Nikon Z
Viewfinder
EOS R5 Mark II
Electronic
Z8
Electronic
Screen
EOS R5 Mark II
3.2″, 2,100,000 dots
Z8
3.2″, 2,088,960 dots
Weather Sealed
EOS R5 Mark II
Yes
Z8
Yes
Release Year
EOS R5 Mark II
2024
Z8
2023

Detailed Comparison

Image Quality

Both the Canon EOS R5 Mark II and the Nikon Z8 feature full-frame sensors delivering stunning image quality, yet there are slight differences worth noting. The Canon R5 Mark II has a resolution of 45 megapixels, allowing for highly detailed images, while the Nikon Z8 comes in slightly higher at 46 megapixels, technically offering a marginal advantage in resolution. In terms of ISO performance, the Canon has a wider range, from 100 to 51200, which could result in better low-light performance compared to the Nikon's ISO range, which maximizes at 25600. Additionally, the R5 Mark II benefits from Canon's renowned color science, often preferred by portrait and wedding photographers seeking pleasing skin tones.

Winner: Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Autofocus System

Autofocus performance is crucial for capturing fast-moving subjects, and here the EOS R5 Mark II takes the lead with an impressive 5850 autofocus points compared to the Z8's 493 points. This substantial number allows for greater subject tracking accuracy, particularly in dynamic shooting environments such as sports or wildlife photography. Moreover, Canon's Dual Pixel autofocus technology allows for smooth and rapid transitions between subjects, enhancing the shooting experience. Although the Nikon Z8 features advanced autofocus capabilities using phase-detection pixels, its fewer points could limit precision in certain challenging scenarios.

Winner: Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Video Capabilities

When it comes to video capabilities, both cameras are equipped to cater to professional videographers, but they differ in specific features. The Canon EOS R5 Mark II offers impressive video specs, including a minimum of 8K recording capabilities, alongside 4K at up to 120 frames per second. The Nikon Z8, on the other hand, also offers 4K 120p but stands out with its ability to output RAW video to an external recorder. This feature can be crucial for those seeking higher quality recordings. Overall, while both cameras shine in video performance, the R5 Mark II's substantial resolution gives it an edge for filmmakers looking to achieve high-quality output.

Winner: Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Build & Ergonomics

Both the Canon EOS R5 Mark II and Nikon Z8 exhibit robust build quality with weather sealing, catering to outdoor shooting environments. The R5 Mark II is slightly lighter at 746g versus the Z8's 910g, which may be a consideration for photographers who carry their gear for extended periods. The ergonomics of both cameras are well-designed, with intuitive button layouts. The Z8 features a slightly larger grip, making it arguably more comfortable for prolonged use, especially with larger lenses. Lastly, both cameras come with electronic viewfinders, but real-world preference may boil down to personal user experience and handling comfort.

Tie

Battery & Storage

In terms of battery life, the Canon EOS R5 Mark II provides a robust 540 shots per charge, significantly surpassing the Nikon Z8's 340 shots. This extended battery life on the R5 Mark II will benefit photographers engaged in long shooting sessions with less frequent battery changes. Storage options are comparable for both models, supporting CFexpress and SD cards. However, as the storage speed and capacity play a crucial role, professionals may appreciate the performance aspects more aligned with their shooting preferences in high-resolution or high-bitrate video scenarios.

Winner: Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Value for Money

The Canon EOS R5 Mark II is priced at $4299, while the Nikon Z8 is slightly more affordable at $3999. However, when weighing the features provided, such as resolution, autofocus points, and video specifications, the R5 Mark II arguably offers more value, especially with its superior image quality and higher autofocus performance, making it more appealing for professional use. Nevertheless, the Z8 also delivers advanced features and a capable package, particularly at its price point, which could serve well for photographers focused on a balance of price and performance.

Winner: Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Our Verdict

Overall, while both the Canon EOS R5 Mark II and the Nikon Z8 present compelling features for photographers and videographers alike, the Canon emerges as the winner predominantly due to its superior image quality, autofocus robustness, and extended battery life, catering effectively to professionals in demanding environments. The Nikon Z8, with its strong video capabilities and slightly lower price, still holds merit for users who may prioritize those aspects. Ultimately, choosing between them would depend on the specific needs and preferences of the user, but for those seeking the utmost in performance, the R5 Mark II is likely to be the better investment.

Also Compare

Based on Reddit community discussions
16 specs analyzed
AI-synthesized review

Frequently Asked Questions

Which camera has better low-light performance?

The Canon EOS R5 Mark II has a wider ISO range (100-51200) compared to the Nikon Z8 (100-25600), likely providing superior low-light performance.

Is the Canon EOS R5 Mark II better for videography?

Yes, the R5 Mark II supports a minimum of 8K video recording and offers high-resolution outputs, making it highly suitable for professional videography.

How do the autofocus systems compare?

The R5 Mark II features significantly more autofocus points (5850) than the Z8 (493), offering better tracking and subject detection, especially in fast-paced situations.

What about battery life?

The Canon EOS R5 Mark II offers a much longer battery life of up to 540 shots, compared to the Nikon Z8 which lasts around 340 shots, beneficial for extended shooting sessions.

Which camera is better for travel?

The Canon EOS R5 Mark II is lighter than the Nikon Z8, making it a more advantageous choice for travelers who prioritize weight and ergonomics.

Browse All Comparisons