Fujifilm X-H2S vs Sony A6100

Both cameras employ APS-C sensors (23.5 x 15.6 mm) and deliver high-resolution images-26MP for the Fujifilm X-H2S and 24MP for the Sony A6100. Practically, the difference in megapixels is minor, but the X-H2S benefits from a stacked sensor design, offering improved readout speeds, dynamic range, and noise performance, especially at higher ISOs.

The X-H2S's ISO range starts at 160 (expandable to 80) and tops out at 12800 (expandable to 51200), slightly narrower than the A6100's base range of 100-32000 (expandable to 51200). However, Fujifilm's renowned color science and dynamic range further distinguish its output, providing rich, film-like colors and flexibility in post-processing.

While the Sony A6100 also produces vibrant images and Sony's JPEG colors have improved, it lacks in-body stabilization, which can limit sharpness when shooting handheld in low light. Overall, both cameras deliver excellent results for general photography, but the X-H2S holds an advantage in challenging lighting and detailed work.

Both cameras feature 425-point autofocus systems, leveraging wide sensor coverage and fast subject acquisition. The X-H2S employs Fujifilm's latest AI-based algorithms and subject detection capabilities, offering superior tracking for faces, eyes, and various animals or moving objects, even at high speeds.

The Sony A6100 is notable for its highly effective Real-time Tracking and Real-time Eye AF, particularly for humans and animals. Its AF system is fast, intuitive, and rarely misses, making it ideal for candid photography and beginners. However, the A6100 lacks the advanced computational AF and deep learning subject detection that the X-H2S brings to the table, as well as the ability to maintain high AF accuracy during extremely rapid burst shooting.

For action, sports, and wildlife photographers, the X-H2S's advanced and customizable AF gives it a professional edge. Still, for most casual and general photographers, the A6100's autofocus remains extremely capable.

This is a clear area of distinction. The Fujifilm X-H2S is engineered for serious video users, offering 4K/60p internal recording with advanced codecs, F-Log, multiple high-quality recording formats, and professional video tools. The X-H2S's stacked sensor minimizes rolling shutter, and its 7-stop in-body image stabilization (IBIS) is invaluable for handheld shooting.

The Sony A6100 can record 4K/30p and delivers good video quality for vlogs or general use. However, its lack of in-body stabilization, limited video-centric features, and shorter maximum recording lengths position it for casual rather than professional use. The screen resolution is also lower, making manual focus and critical review less precise in video.

If video is a primary focus-especially action, wildlife, or handheld work-the X-H2S is the far superior choice. The A6100 covers basic video needs, but doesn't approach the capabilities of the Fujifilm flagship.

The Fujifilm X-H2S boasts a robust, weather-sealed magnesium alloy body built for professional use. Its larger hand grip, tactile controls, and overall ergonomics make it more comfortable for extended shoots or when using large lenses. The fully articulating, high-resolution 3-inch screen (1,620,000 dots) and high-res electronic viewfinder enable precise composition and review. Weather-sealing means the X-H2S can confidently handle inclement environments, from rain to dust.

The Sony A6100 emphasizes portability, weighing just 396g versus the X-H2S's 660g. It's significantly smaller (120 x 67 x 59mm), easily fitting in most bags or even jacket pockets, making it great for travel or on-the-go shooting. The controls and build feel less premium, with a plastic build and no weather sealing, but this also makes it less intimidating for newcomers.

Those prioritizing ruggedness, pro ergonomics, and outdoor reliability will prefer the X-H2S, but for lightness and discretion, the A6100 shines.

The X-H2S offers an excellent battery life of approximately 580 shots per charge, outlasting the A6100's 420 shots-substantial for professional and enthusiast shooters alike, especially during events or outdoor assignments. The larger battery size of the X-H2S also suits its greater power demands and performance features.

Regarding memory, both use a single SD card slot, but the X-H2S supports faster UHS-II cards for high-bitrate video and continuous shooting demands. The A6100's SD slot suffices for typical photo and entry-level video projects, but may limit buffer clearance and speed with high-speed bursts or video.

While both deliver acceptable battery performance and storage for their respective audiences, Fujifilm's model offers superior stamina and flexibility for demanding scenarios.

The Sony A6100's greatest asset is accessibility: at $750 (body only), it provides outstanding autofocus, good image quality, decent 4K video, and portability. For beginners, hobbyists, and those on a budget, it's a terrific entry point into mirrorless photography with plenty of upgrade paths within the Sony E-mount ecosystem.

The X-H2S, at $2499 (body only), is a significant investment, but its feature set-stacked sensor, class-leading burst speed, advanced video, pro build-caters to those needing top-tier performance. For enthusiasts or pros who demand uncompromising hybrid capabilities and rugged design, the value proposition is strong, though overkill for casual users.

If you need advanced features and can justify the spend, the X-H2S's price is reasonable. However, the A6100 wins for pure value, delivering fantastic performance per dollar.

Both cameras feature mature, well-supported lens systems. The Fujifilm X-mount offers excellent proprietary lenses-from compact primes to fast telephotos-optimally tuned for Fujifilm bodies, with a balanced mix of affordable and premium glass. Third-party offerings are expanding but still fewer than Sony's.

The Sony E-mount boasts one of the largest APS-C lens selections on the market, spanning Sony, Sigma, Tamron, and Samyang/Rokinon, in addition to full-frame E-mount lenses which are fully compatible. This makes it easy to find affordable, specialized, or compact lenses to suit nearly any use case or budget. For entry-level lens shoppers or those wanting maximum variety, Sony has an edge.

In summary, both ecosystems are strong, but Sony's broader, more affordable lens choices give it a slight advantage, especially for those growing their system over time.