Full Specifications
| Focal Length | 70-200mm |
| Maximum Aperture | f/4 |
| Minimum Aperture | f/32 |
| Lens Mount | RF |
| Optical Stabilization | Yes |
| Filter Size | 77mm |
| Minimum Focus Distance | 0.6m |
| Weight | 690g |
| Dimensions | 84 x 119 mm |
| Weather Sealed | Yes |
| Optical Elements | 16 elements |
| Optical Groups | 11 groups |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 blades |
What Users Think
Pros
- Compact and lightweight design makes it easy to carry around, especially compared to the f/2.8 version.
- Excellent image quality that is sharp even at f/4, with good performance across the zoom range.
- High ISO performance is commendable, allowing for clean images at high settings; users report good results at ISO 12,800 and even 25,600.
- Image stabilization (IS) helps to achieve sharper images at lower shutter speeds, beneficial for indoor and low-light shooting.
- The lens is well-suited for travel photography and casual shooting, providing versatility for different types of photography.
Cons
- The maximum aperture of f/4 is limiting in low-light situations, making it less effective for indoor sports or events compared to f/2.8 lenses.
- Some users noted that the bokeh is less aesthetically pleasing compared to the f/2.8 version, affecting background separation.
- Minor reports of softness when wide open require stopping down to f/5.6 to achieve optimal sharpness.
- Slightly slower autofocus speed compared to higher-end f/2.8 lenses, particularly in fast-moving situations.
Community Verdict
The Canon RF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM is well-regarded for its compact design and excellent image quality, making it a strong choice for general photography and travel. However, its limitations in low-light conditions and lower maximum aperture compared to f/2.8 alternatives may not meet the needs of all photographers, especially those shooting fast-moving subjects in dim environments.
"{'text': 'The size of the f/4 version is just hard to beat. I can fit my R8 + 28-70 and 70-200 in my Wandrd 9L sling and still not feel the weight too much for daily use.', 'context': 'User discussing the compact nature of the RF 70-200 f/4L and its impact on daily photography.'}"
- Reddit user
"{'text': "I'll def miss the 2.8, but for me at least, I wasn't even bringing the EF along because I needed to use a larger bag.", 'context': 'User explaining their decision to switch to the f/4 primarily due to size and portability.'}"
- Reddit user
"{'text': "I've been using the RF 70-200 f4 for low-light theatre performances and dance recitals and it looks great with little noise.", 'context': "User providing feedback on the lens's performance in challenging lighting conditions."}"
- Reddit user
Want the Full Story?
Read our comprehensive review covering optical quality, sharpness, bokeh, autofocus performance, build quality, and more.
Read Full ReviewPairs Well With
Camera bodies compatible with the RF mount
Similar Lenses
Other lenses in the same focal range
RF 10-20mm f/4L IS STM
RF 100-300mm f/2.8L IS USM
RF 100-400mm f/5.6-8 IS USM
RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM
RF 100mm f/2.8L MACRO IS USM
RF 1200mm f/8L IS USM
RF 135mm f/1.8L IS USM
