Full Specifications
| Focal Length | 200-800mm |
| Maximum Aperture | f/6.3 |
| Minimum Aperture | f/54 |
| Lens Mount | Canon RF |
| Optical Stabilization | Yes |
| Autofocus Motor | USM |
| Filter Size | 95mm |
| Minimum Focus Distance | 2.62m |
What Users Think
Pros
- Incredible reach at 800mm for wildlife photography, allowing capturing distant subjects.
- Good image stabilization performance, with users reporting sharp images even at slow shutter speeds.
- Relatively affordable for a long lens, providing high value compared to similar offerings.
- Lightweight for its size, making it manageable for extended periods of use.
- Versatile zoom range, allowing for flexibility in framing shots without needing to switch lenses.
- Works well with modern autofocus systems, benefiting from improved autofocus technology in newer camera bodies.
Cons
- Aperture performance is limited to f/9 at 800mm, which can struggle in low light conditions.
- No significant improvement in image quality compared to other available lenses in the same range.
- Autofocus issues reported in low light or busy scenes, with some users experiencing front-focusing problems.
- Build quality concerns, with reports of the lens breaking in half during use.
- Some users find it cumbersome to carry due to its size, which can diminish portability during hikes.
Community Verdict
Overall, the Canon RF 200-800mm f/6.3-9 IS USM is well-received for its impressive reach and good image stabilization at a competitive price point. However, it faces criticism regarding its maximum aperture and potential autofocus issues in challenging lighting, leading some to prefer other options like the RF 100-500mm for better low-light performance and image quality.
"{'text': 'The images as you can see are super crisp. Autofocus worked great.', 'context': 'User review in a thread discussing initial impressions.'}"
- Reddit user
"{'text': "I have both and the 100-500 by far sees more action. The 200-800 is a good lens, but the aperture isn't as usable when dealing with canopy cover.", 'context': 'User response comparing the 100-500mm and 200-800mm in a discussion about preferred lenses.'}"
- Reddit user
"{'text': 'I think the 100-500 is better for low light. I often get softer shots with the 200-800.', 'context': 'User feedback in a thread debating lens options for wildlife photography.'}"
- Reddit user
Want the Full Story?
Read our comprehensive review covering optical quality, sharpness, bokeh, autofocus performance, build quality, and more.
Read Full ReviewPairs Well With
Camera bodies compatible with the Canon RF mount
Similar Lenses
Other lenses in the same focal range
RF 10-20mm f/4L IS STM
RF 100-300mm f/2.8L IS USM
RF 100-400mm f/5.6-8 IS USM
RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM
RF 100mm f/2.8L MACRO IS USM
RF 1200mm f/8L IS USM
RF 135mm f/1.8L IS USM
